Cape Town – The chief forensic analyst at the police’s forensic laboratory has told the Western Cape Large Court that “no not known DNA was uncovered on the scene” at the Van Breda relatives dwelling in the luxurious de Zalze Estate in Stellenbosch.
Twenty-two-year-previous Henri van Breda is currently on trial for allegedly murdering his mom, father and older brother on January 27, 2015. His sister Marli, who was 16 decades previous at the time, survived the assault.
Van Breda has claimed that a laughing, axe-wielding intruder, wearing gloves, a balaclava and dim clothing, was driving the brutal assault.
But on Monday, DNA expert Lieutenant-Colonel Sharlene Otto claimed no “not known DNA” experienced been uncovered in the 216 samples her laboratory analysed.
She told the court that “just about every touch leaves a trace” in accordance with the “locard basic principle”.
Otto claimed nail scrapings taken from Henri’s left hand contained the blended DNA of himself, his mom Teresa and his brother Rudi.
A blood sample taken from the bottom of the axe manage also experienced a “mixture final result”. Otto claimed Henri’s DNA could be go through into the mixture, as properly as the DNA of other people, but there was not enough to go through a complete profile.
A swab of blood from the head of the axe again showed a mixture final result of the two male and feminine DNA belonging to Teresa and Rudi.
Otto testified that blood uncovered on the corner of the shower floor was also a mixture of DNA profiles – Rudi’s, Teresa’s and Henri’s.
The manage of a knife contained touch DNA that belonged to Rudi.
The lieutenant-colonel claimed fingernail swabbing of the father Martin’s hand also showed a mixture profile, but the only complete profile that could be extracted was of Rudi’s DNA.
She claimed they did not generally analyse in excess of 200 samples, but in this case there need to have been “several bloodstains”.
“We did not battle to get DNA. I suspect there need to have been lots of blood. We didn’t battle to get optimal DNA final results. None of my DNA final results are surprising. In all the final results, we were in a position to acquire unique variations on the very same topic. That in itself is regular and to be predicted”.
Otto told the court that the blood on the bottom of the axe manage contained Henri’s DNA. “We could not establish any individual else other than Henri in this distinct sample”.
On Monday morning, courtroom 1 was buzzing as media retailers established up online video cameras as the trial from Van Breda resumed just after an almost two-thirty day period break.
Decide Siraj Desai earlier this year claimed he did not object to the filming of court proceedings just after Media24 introduced an software to be allowed to livestream the case. Both the condition and the defence were opposed to livestreaming, nevertheless, and approached the Supreme Court of Appeal.
The SCA established apart Desai’s first order and referred it back again to him, providing him a guideline or established of ideas to refer to.
Primarily, it dominated that the default place need to be that media need to be allowed to stream, unless there is an objection. Desai designed an order on August 3 that media be allowed to livestream court proceedings, unless there was an objection from a particular witness, the defence or the prosecution.
The prosecution objected to the livestreaming of Otto’s testimony as she testified about the typical operating methods at the police’s forensic laboratory.
Senior condition prosecutor Susan Galloway claimed these wanted to remain private. Decide Desai ordered the cameras to quit recording through her testimony.
Otto commenced by describing to the court what DNA is: “DNA is the molecule of life”.
“It governs just about every solitary characteristic you have as human beings. For a distinct individual the DNA is the very same from the hair roots to the toe nails. We have our DNA profile from the day of conception and it stays the very same right until the day we die.”